Fire chiefs advocate for retaining dual staircase requirements in high-rise residential buildings

March 18, 2024

Understanding the fire chiefs’ position on staircase regulations in residential buildings

In a recent statement, the International Association of Fire Chiefs (IAFC) highlighted a pressing issue in building safety.

They expressed deep concern over emerging trends towards deregulation that propose to eliminate requirements for a second staircase in R-2 residential buildings above three stories.

The IAFC warns that this shift not only endangers occupants but also significantly impedes emergency response operations.

According to the IAFC: “These proposals, backed by developers, builders, and urban planners, bypass the established National Code Consensus process, creating local exceptions that compromise the safety of both occupants and firefighters.”

The necessity of dual staircases in high-rise buildings

The IAFC emphasizes the importance of two separate staircases in residential buildings exceeding three stories.

This requirement, which the IAFC says is rooted in scientific research and consensus code processes, provides essential redundancy in egress options.

This is crucial for both occupant evacuation and firefighter access during emergencies.

The association maintains that this principle, aimed at safeguarding lives, should not be compromised for short-term benefits.

Addressing modern fire hazards and enhancing building safety

The proliferation of modern hazards, such as lithium-ion battery-powered devices, underscores the need for stringent building codes.

The IAFC argues for the necessity of a second staircase in high-rise residential buildings to address these risks effectively.

Moreover, the provision of two staircases is not only a safety measure but also enhances the efficiency, convenience, and inclusivity of living environments.

They noted: “It mitigates congestion, promotes equitable access for individuals with mobility challenges, and fosters a more welcoming community for all residents.”

Long-term implications and the call to action

While acknowledging concerns about construction costs and floor space, the IAFC believes the long-term benefits of retaining the two-staircase requirement outweigh these considerations.

The association urges fire service leaders to oppose legislative attempts to amend this requirement.

They emphasize the need to engage with urban planners, legislators, and the building community to ensure community safety and the welfare of emergency responders.

FSJA Comment

The International Association of Fire Chiefs’ (IAFC) position on retaining the dual staircase requirement in high-rise residential buildings brings a critical perspective to the ongoing debate about building safety and emergency preparedness.

The association’s emphasis on maintaining stringent building codes, especially in the context of evolving fire hazards, highlights the need for a balance between innovation in building design and safety protocols.

The IAFC’s call to action is a reminder of the interconnected nature of urban planning, legislative decisions, and emergency response effectiveness.

This issue transcends individual interests, touching on broader aspects of public safety and community well-being.

Read Next

Subscribe Now